gatomon woman's kind story
Since it's Substack, I'll open my memo. Let's start with life portfolio.
Photography is not a medium of equality. Photography is a powerful tool. This power comes from the body-image. The body in the photograph is reduced to a symbol and converted into a subject, a substance inferior to the subject taking the picture. At this time, in the case of this article, the luminance outside the body of the president revealed is dematerialized by the performance of the social function of the photograph called a mugshot, and the body is subordinate to the photograph. The question of whether President Trump's mugshot is essential is that the organ is amplified and reduced as long as the setting as the body part of the photograph exists.
Deep fried meme image
It means that once the resolution of an image is downgraded, one person downloaded it and utilized it. The more people who use the image, the lower the resolution of the image and the unrecognizable shapes and primary colors of rgb come out. If you think of this color as one atom, the atom is a labor value and the amount of will (opinion) once mined.
At this time, assuming that Deep fried memory maker exists, using it to downgrade the resolution of the image deprives others of their will and steals it, adding to their (opinion) will.
Image makers benefit from incidental income such as advertising. Such a series of takeover limits and deprives individuals of their freedom.
the grammar of photographs
Photography is an art of segmentation and harmony. Humans who choose photography rescue a scene in the context of before and after time and event.
The continuity of photography is constructed by human consciousness. Human history that remains on the surface of consciousness extends human vision. Our vision is limited.
Humans share a common opinion and form a group. The eyes in that group look at the world different from the eyes of other groups. When each other's eyes turn, the clock compressed at a viewing angle is brilliant. The product of the eye, in other words, the material of the eye, is photography.
With the recent trend, discourse formers of the present age often create and talk about discourse with their own works. This is clearly a series of unusual events different from the past. More reliably, we know them as 'artists' before we are discourse formers. To maintain one's discourse, the act of showing the perspective of immateriality to others as matter is, in other words, one's own opinion. It is to profess that 'I am its creator'.
What can we make and share in this era when intellectual production activities have become individual ownership? It is a discourse that is unilaterally injected. Works lead to one thought and one path. People will see the work and have different impressions, but the text attached to the work soon abandons the appreciation, and the journey of intellectual inquiry soon returns to failure. There is only one way we can realize: to follow the path led by the work made by the artist to induce (to) his discourse.
Then let's think about the utility of the white cube exhibition. It was around the end of the 19th and early 20th centuries that paintings began to be hung on white walls with nothing. The color of the wall, which changed spontaneously, was an aesthetically outstanding color, because other colored walls were less noticeable. Humans who are accustomed to the wall have come to recognize that the wall's color was the same as before.
White is not green. Red-brown is not white. Nevertheless, we are comfortable with the wall. The comfort soon disappears from our sight. What remains of our vision is not the wall, but the picture itself. How about a white cube exhibition that excludes the explanation of the work? The wall that disappeared in front of our eyes has reappeared and is decorating the space. Humans are afraid of its status.
The wall blocks and expands our view of the painting before it is hung on it. Humans have gained confidence in being able to control the wall or have given up their self-control and determination to revive such a wall.
What does this mean? Is it telling or not to explain the work? This is a persistent problem with modern museums. To diagnose this problem, it is necessary to dissect the museum. What would we call an empty space where all the works in the museum are put out and there is nothing? Can it still be called a museum?
Then, how about a part of a building that collects works that have been put down as a storage or a temporary storage? What should we name the phenomenon that the place becomes a museum and a storage because of the work? The answer to all these questions is that we should be the ones who leave the place and close their eyes without looking at the work. Painting is human's projected desire and the source-product of consciousness. Can you resist that desire?
Marx, Engels' [Communist Declaration] and 'ghost'
'One ghost is wandering around Europe. The ghost of communism'
All the forces of old Europe, the Pope, the tsar, the Metternich, the French radicals and the German secret police, formed a holy alliance to hunt the ghost.
Ein Gespenst geht um in Europa – das Gespenst des Kommunismus. Alle Mächte des alten Europa haben sich zu einer heiligen Hetzjagd gegen dies Gespenst verbündet, der Papst und der Zar, Metternich und Guizot, französische Radikale und deutsche Polizisten.
A <spectre> is haunting Europe -- the spectre of Communism. All the Powers of old Europe have entered into a holy alliance to exorcise this spectre: Pope and Czar, Metternich and Guizot, French Radicals and German police-spies.
=> Why did you use Spectre instead of Ghost?
Spectre = 1-1. Meaning ghosts, ghosts, and monsters Used to mean 'object of fear'
Etymology is Latin for appearance, ghosts, and fantasy.
1-2. This Latin etymology is a mixture of values produced from continuous data, separating exactly what data is present, and recording its strength and intensity.
Ghost = 2-1. Meaning ghost. The German idiom is geist.
2-2. It means that the soul of the dead cannot go to the underworld for regret, original soul, or other reasons.
<Hypothesis> Spectre is the other who is the object of fear who is rejected as an outsider of the group,
Ghost contains the inner tenets of the group, or the meaning of one's double nouns
We have more than one body before we have one, It can be transformed by one's will, taste, and preference.
Let's also say it's replaceable. That is the free will of man. At this time, the ghost exists in us, and that is the body. It is theoretically established that we exist.
In other words, it can be said to be pluralistic body monism. So are our bodies clones? The humanity that created slavery falls into methodological skepticism. Is the dominated body-slavery subordinate to the dominated body?
The origin of the revolution has been going on from the moment we didn't notice. Its life has not progressed before our memories.
One moment's movement breaks the surface tension and the water in the cup overflows. That was the history of mankind.
At the same time as one object hits a wall that can't be crossed, the other object. Hit the body by free will or by learning. A wall that doesn't hit at once only creates a mountain of cadaveric acid in the end.
Is freedom by free will. Is it freedom by a priori learning and fluctuation.
Let's draw a line. At what point is the current substitution of the line. There will be no points on the line that can be drawn. Because one day we will be the future and surely the past.
Our field of view is limited. We can see from that angle . History is our material, and it becomes the body. The history of matter that the body can perceive is to the extent that we touch it. Our bodies are sacred. It is a sanctuary. Neither God nor the king nor the bourgeoisie can serve as idols. A person with a body cannot idolize his body.
If it were history, I would make it a non-existent state. The human body is huge to be confined to the space of history. If there's an important axis in life, it's a chapter, It will be a huge guide to life. I am free.
It's the same for you. The most important thing in our lives is to believe that nothing exists, You don't even believe in this fact. This is your freedom. So we must transcend the nation. We must abandon the land and rise.
So I declare here and now. Our bodies will be our nation.